EXHIBITS
PAGE 1
I. FORM DAB -101 1 PAGE}
II. CMS 1696 1 PAGE} ___-__-____B
III. GOOD CAUSE 17 PAGES
IV. REQUEST TO REOPEN 4 PAGES
V. DRAFT EXHIBITS 1 PAGE
VI. DRAFT SUBPOENAS+ COMPLETE SSA
FILE; NOT THE HAND PICKED 174 YOU
RECEIVED AND WE NEVER GOT A COPY
OF THE 174 PAGES
VII. TIME TO RECONSTRUCT FILES 1 PAGE
VIII. REQUEST FOR COPY OF SURVIVING
FILES 1 PAGE
IX. MONEY AMOUNTS APPEALED +
CURRENT BILL (NO APPEAL RIGHTS
ON BILL) 7 PAGES
X. DAB 101 + 1696 + ....-____B2 +
POSTMARK PROOF 4 PAGES
XI. DAB 101+ 1696 + ....-____B6 + 4 PAGES
XII. DAB 101 + 1696 + ....-____D +
POSTMARK PROOF 4 PAGES
EXHIBITS
PAGE 2
XIII. DAB 101 + 1696 + .... -____D4 + 4 PAGES
POSTARK PROOF
XIV. DAB 101 + 1696 + ....-____D6 + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XV. DAB 101 + 1696 + ....- ____E + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XVI. DAB 101 + 1696 +....-_____E1 + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XVII. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...-_____TB + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XVIII. DAB 101 +1696 + ...- _____TD + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
IXX. DAB 101 +1696 + ... - ____TE + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XX. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...- ____W + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XXI. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...-____W6 + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XXII. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...- ____A + 4 PAGES
EXHIBITS
PAGE 3
XXIII. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...- ____M + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XXIV. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...- ____T + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XXV. DAB 101 + 1696 + ...- ____TA + 4 PAGES
POSTMARK PROOF
XXVI. DAB REMAND ORDER M-16-30
DATED 8/25/2017 5 PAGES
XXVII. 10/20/2017 DISMISSAL WITH AN
EXHIBIT LIST THAT SHOWS ONLY A
SMALL PORTION OF THE (ENTIRE
CASE) FILE (AT SSA OR CMS WHEN
ALJ JUDGE WEIN SIGNED DISMISSAL
APPARENTLY WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL
FILE FOR THE FIRST HEARING IN 2015
THAT HAD MULTIPLE HEARINGS
CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE DOCKET
NUMBER AND NO ORDER TO SEPARATE
AND WE APPROVED CONSOLIDATION
BUT NO DECISIONS GIVEN IN 2015 ON
THE ,MULTIPLE LEGAL ISSUES IN THE
AGREED TO CONSOLIDATION. NEITHER
ALJ IN 2015 NOR IN 2017 GAVE ANY INITIAL
HEARING DECISION ON THE MULTIPLE
LEGAL ISSUES REGARDING PREMIUMS
. ONLY ONE LEGAL ISSUE ADDRESSED
ON ONLY ONE AND SAME HEARING
FROM A 2014 DECISION..DONE WITHOUT
THE ENTIRE CASE FILES WHICH HAVE
NEVER BEEN POSTED BY CONTRACTOR,
ET AL. AND APPARENTLY ANY FILINGS
SINCE NOT POSTED BUT FOR A HAND
PICKED ITEMS THAT ARE MANIPULATING
ANY DECISIONS.
ONE OF THE MULTIPLES IS AS OLD AS 2006 WITH
TIMELY FILED DATES AS ALL OTHERS HAVE BEEN.
. AND ALL MULTIPLE HEARINGS
CONSOLIDATED ARE ON VARIOUS AND
DIFFERING LEGAL ISSUES..UNDER THIS DOCKET
NUMBER.
OTHER TIMELY AND LEGALLY FILED HEARING REQUESTS ARE PENDING
AT MEDICARE ALJ'S AND DAB MEDICARE WITH
NO DOCKET NUMBERS FOR THEM AND NO DECISIONS EITHER..
THOSE ARE ON NON PREMIUM ISSUES WITH
REGARD TO CLAIMS INCLUDING CLAIMS PAID 17 TIMES PER
CLAIM BACK TO 1/1/06 AND CONTINUING, INCLUDING ON THE
MULTIPLE MEDICARE NUMBERS CREATED BY THE CONTRACTORS
AGENCY JUDICIAL REVIEW IS NEEDED BEFORE ANY FURTHER ACTION
CAN BE TAKEN TO STOP. AS THE CIVIL JUDICIAL REVEIW IS NEEDED AND
THERE HAS BEEN CONTINUED DELAYS IN AFFORDING CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS OF REDRESS WITH AGENCIES WHICH MUST LEGALLY BE DONE.)
AND LINDA HAS NEVER SEEN (WHICH) 174 PAGES FROM SSA (NOR HAS HER
NON ATTORNEY SPOUSAL REPRESENTATIVE EITHER.)
WHEN THEIR(SSA) FILE IS SEVERAL THOUSAND PAGES WITH JUDGES
REMAND ORDERS NOT PROCESSED FOR MANY YEARS AND APPEALS
NEVER ANSWERED OR PROCESSED. ( ONE IS TIMELY FILED IN 9/2000 WITH NO
DECISION TO DATE AND ANOTHER JUDGE REMAND TO DO THE DISABILITY DECISION
IS DATED BACK TO 2011 FROM SSA APPELLATE JUDGE AND CONCURRING ALJ REMAND ORDER AS THE INITIAL MEDICAL DECISION WAS INTEFERRED WITH AT
THE HIGHEST LEVEL AT SSA SO THAT HER MEDICAL RECORDS, AND THE
CONSULTANT BOARD CERTIFIED PULMONOLIGIST AND EXTENSIVE TESTING
DONE BY REQUEST OF THE STATE AGENCY FOR SSA DISABILITY CLAIMS WAS NOT CONSIDERED AND DISAPPEARED.. AND
THE HEAD OF SSA AT THE TIME 'DECIDED TO BE A DOCTOR AND TOLD THEM WHAT TO PUT DOWN WHICH THEY DID AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BUT DID SIGN THAT IT WAS DONE FROM HIS VERBAL ORDERS. AND THEY HAD NO MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION TO JUSTIFY WHAT HE TOLD THEM TO PUT DOWN.
NOW THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA OFFICE FOR SSA DISABIITY COULD FIND NO COMPUTER RECORD THAT THEY EVER HAD MY FILE AT ANY TIME FROM RECENTLY BACK TO THE INITIAL FILINGS IN 1989 FOR SSA OR SSI ON ANY OF THE 3 CLAIM NUMBERS LEGALLY ISSUED BY SSA. SINCE 1989.
AND THE CLAIMS FROM 1989 THROUGH 9/24/1994 FF. AS THE PRIOR IS STILL LEGALLY PENDING WITH SSA ON SUBSTANTIAL GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT AND TRIAL WORK PERIODS ETC ISSUES. AND THE INITIAL HEARING REMANDED 3 TIMES THERE ALREADY HAD ASTHMA AND NOT OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA WITH HEART , KIDNEY BLOOD AND OTHER PHYSICAL MEDICAL USSUES INCLUDED AS THEY HAD NOT BEEN CLEARLY DIAGNOSED YET BUT THE RAW MEDICAL TESTING DATA SHOWED IT ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD BUT NO DOCTOR HAD YET INTERPRETED IT FOR PARTIES.
AND THIS ONGOING PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUES IN MULTIPLE AGENCIES AND THEIR CONTRACTORS WITH COMMON ENTITIES INVOLVED HAS CAUSED GROSS PHYSICIAL AND .FINANCIAL HARM TO THE CURRENT LIFE THREATENING STRUGGLE FOR MEDICAL CARE.
AND WISH TO INVOKE THE TERRI SCHIAVO LAW AS A BASIS FOR EXPEDITED HEARINGS AND ATTENTION TO ALL PENDING MATTERS IN ALL THE MULTIPLE AGENCIES WHICH HAS A PART OF THE WHOLE... SINCE INJURED AS AN HHS EMPLOYEE ON 1/10/89..)
9 PAGES
XXIII. PARTIES NOTIFIED 2 PAGES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATCH FOR ADDENDUM LATER FOR THE REST OF THE DAILY RECAP
LINDA JOY ADAMS
DOYLE E ADAMS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment