Violations of civil rights page 31: owcp reconsideration on schedule award issue and request to make ACS give you the files

Office of Federal Workers Compensation
525 Griffin St.
Dallas, TX 75202
Attn: Christina Stark regional office manager
Teresa Davis, Claims Examiner
 I received a ' ludicrous' response to a 1996 request for a schedule award. Its not funny, but life threatening to take what seems to be a few pages from Medicare's collection unit contractor attempting to collect monies back to them for bills approved by federal workers compensation that you seem oblivious to because you don't have my file available?.You have numerous reconsiderations that have gone unanswered and also many ca1'. ca2's and ca2a's n file that have never had an initial decision even with 9 judges and 2 hearing officers pointing out they can't review something with no initial decision. In 2/09, if you had read the last 3 appellate judges remand, you would know, if you had the entire file available to understand the context as they do, that when they set aside the misinformation that I didn't return to work in 1990 even when documented with 240 EEOC complaints and EEOC sanctions for the tortuous and painful and physically harming ordeal I went through trying to work without the promised reasonable accommodation s that HHS said they should provide. HHS was the employing Dept over SSA and EEOC matters are still pending against them that have never been settled. When monies were sent me in mailto:'09@'05 from  your offline office system, which raises a grave security issue, the claims examiner did not make decision on the ca1'. ca2's , ca2a' in file so that Social security, my agency in conjunction with HHS's personnel office could go ahead and do the leave buy back. This takes a formal decision from OWCP, even if SSA and I are in agreement.
Are you saying that US dept of Labor judges and claims examiners have no control over filings, or what you can see to render decision, that Affiliated computer systems is allowed to pick and choose what they want you to see  and that includes judges' remand orders?  ACS, who has not processed over 3/4THS of my bills and not input 11 years of oxygen bills because: the computer will pay them as their manger said and would result in the offline ' dummy ' file they set up being brought on line with the official US dept of labor secured file on me in Washington that shows permanent medical benefits for my accepted conditions. Which the Medicare judges were able to obtain, but not my claims examiner nor the bill paying unit at Affiliated computer systems.
I'm in this life threatening situation due to felony destruction of my files in the Dallas regional office before Affiliated computer services took over as a result of the criminal investigation of the regional office and laxity of security on multiple claimants files. 4 years of my life were  taken out' of the file so that my file could be overturned as it made it look like I didn't return to work in 1990. The hearing office remanded the case and neglected to make the needed statement to ' set aside that erroneous decision.' Finally the last three judges at ECAB did say the ' magic words' so that wage loss can be reinstated. They had the CSR applications and statements, all the other pertinent info and again reminded OWCP of the many issues in file needing initial decisions.
Nothing that the judges ordered have been done. especially for you to ask ME for the " fact of the case' as they knew  no one knew what was going on and was only getting bits and pieces from ACS.
Why do I, the claimant have to make the US dept of labors contractor obey the terms of a govt contract which would not be legal if all persons weren't treated equally. Their job is to post the various pieces of the file that come from all directions, whether, me or the highest judges in the agency. They are not to refuse to set up my basic file and make it disappear as what happened in 6/2004 when 35000 pages of the reconstructed file arrived from the appellate judges at ECAB and ' walked  out the door to be worked but not before, as few misleading pieces were posted to manipulate the outcome.
With permission from the Secretary of Labor, I was permitted to use the 1-800 number at the ACS Tallahassee Fl office and we put claim numbers on every piece, and redid all the out of pocket bills and travel vouchers back to 1989 on the new forms so they could be paid, only to have the boxes they sent up to the London Ky ACS office, again disappear. Since then multiple times, documents have been sent in only to have them never reach the claims examiners to review and make decisions based on the ' facts of the case'
Remember ACS has ' decided to lie to every medical provider and supplier and other parties with interest in the case and say the case is closed when it obviously isn't or you wouldn't be trying to decide a permanent disability without the extensive documentations in the file. Exactly what schedule award is being done? The entire list of accepted conditions has not yet been determined as no ca1or ca2 has had an initial decision since the 1990's. This is a progressive disease with long term side effects of approved medications, etc.
HOW CAN THE FILINGS GET TO THE CLAIMS EXAMINER? Can't you ' control' your contractor and order them to treat every claimant equally and stop discriminating against me, an elderly, disabled woman, whose religion is to value all life, including mine.
After years of this, I wrote numerous certified letters that were never answered and left messages. how can i get the facts of the case, i. e the file you should already have in front of you so the various items can get worked,.
A few weeks ago, i discovered on your web site, I could now file a CA1 , and ca2 with your office. I have a injury that was secondary, tertiary to the original accepted conditions and sent them to you and they were received by your office. However, you never got them and probably never will as is the usual situation. They were immediately set to ACS in London Ky to add to  a non existent computer claims file. If one saw only the filing, out of context of the entire file, it may make little sense to some not familiar with the medical consequences of 22+ yeas on cortisone steroids and the prior similar type claims never answered either.
There is nothing to file with ECAB as you haven't reviewed the filings yet and The judges will just send you another remand to work the case. I fell with unfilled prescription as suppliers have to know who will be paying out of my three health plans and the diagnosis listed is the accepted one at owcp. They have called ACS and gotten lied to. ACS is the ' third party?' Once, they were promised the file was being set up up a few years ago and it never was. Some of the call center ACS employees are aware they don't know what is going on, others have not been informed to tell the truth, that the file isn't set up so medical care will continue to be obstructed. That's not the terms of ACS's contract at all to discriminate and manipulate outcomes of claims decisions. Contract wouldn't be legal if it did.
I have suggested in the certified letters, to pay current wage loss since the reason for suspension was now officially set aside by your highest judges, that no other interested party, my agency nor you appealed. Then call Lincare and make it right for the lies to them that I'd received some humongous settlement that included the monies to pay them causing the monopoly oxygen supplier in my areas to cease service: another death panel decision. They of course want paid and the invoices are in the file and never processed. They bought out Health Connections and now have the contract with you and payments are not being made since the buy out.Arkansas Blues did pay, duplicate, for some of the months and continued to do so until Ill Blues took over in my area and decided to post erroneous info that no owcp exists and dumped the bills on to Medicare's contractor, Palmetta GBAwho balked at paying owcp's bills until Cigna took over and paid  the invoices they had ( many were destroyed by palmetto gba whose parent company has just bought cigna govt services out. ) They sent them to the recovery unit  who had sent out some collection letters to owcp in ' 05 and 07 and these were sent to you in '08 and ignored on other obvious bills.  I filed an appeal for an enforcement of the collection and the Medicare judges got the internal documents you can't seen to  be able to access. Its posted bi-weekly to the Medicare computer and no one is to alter it per Medicare's coordination of benefits a subsidiary of Group health , who maintains it for the entire country and all who have a Medicare card.  They are in violation continually of their US Dept of labor contract which adds to the obstruction and is engaged in a theft of the Medicare trust fund when all claims should be coded conditional payments and sent to owcp to collect the monies back and stop this on -going discrimination.
On 9/29.,2010, Judge Gilda Morrison, appellate judge on case m09.1406  upheld the two Administrative law Judges ruling that owcp and fed blues were primary to Medicare ; but ruled that owcp is to pay the oxygen bills, i.e. owcp needs to review all my bills first and either pay if for accepted conditions and then notify providers on others that the medical issues are pending for acceptance and to let fed blues and Medicare pay but code for a future decision and repayment to them should they be accepted. None of the constitutional and logical processes are occurring which puts my life at great risk and me paying out of pocket for life sustaining medical care with approval for life by owcp. and spending monies to file and refile papers that never get reviewed in defiance of judges remand after judges remand.
Ms. Davis and Ms. Stark are new to this case and when Lynn Blodgett, President and CEO of ACS came over to you with the letter I had sent him and published at washingtonpost.com to him in early '09; he ' neglected to inform you that his London Ky office was and had been refusing to set up my computer file. This is a real he said, she said but the result is my claims examiner is still being giving bits and pieces of a file and a manipulated result. No one should infer your letter of 3/28/2010 that this concerns any other issue but the 1996 schedule award, on which condition? and since you  apparently never read the 2/09 judges remand nor the many letters I' d sent requesting some system to reconstruct the facts of the case,i.e. the file; you obviously had everything withheld from you by ACS so that they now control judges and claims examiners and what they can do. This company could set up a $0 balance ATM card and ask the state of OK to maintain it for 2 years when no welfare benefits were due, but can't set up my life sustaining computer file for the US dept of labor.
As a result of a recent speech by Secretary of labor Hilda Solis, I filed a contract compliance complaint with the US dept of labor in Washington d.c and a civil rights complaint's against them and Medicare coordination of benefits for altering the official records continuously for a decade, both of which are the US dept of labor's contractors that have gravely discriminated against me and my right to live. Then, your letter arrives as a result of the filing? is this to be construed as a retaliations by ACS, for ' feeding you a few pages, again? Medicare coordination of benefits doesn't remove the owcp, they just got involved in a ' ricco' situation (US atty's words) where Trailblazers and others used phony Medicare claim numbers and altered diagnosis codes to circumvent the security, from the us dept of labor, on my real claim number that kicks back the bills as owcp's required they be processed as conditional payments and collection letters sent to owcp for repayment. Routinely ignored by ACS, this time passed on to you?
This is a reconsideration request AND a request for a system to be set up to present to you the documentation, etc and other matters that are pending before you , but withheld by your contractor which I now consider a retaliation as well as on -going discrimination.
ARE YOU REQUIRING ME TO SUE AFFILIATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS ON BEHALF OF THE US DEPT OF LABOR? If so, will your legal counsel fully cooperate and will you be fully cooperative in providing documentation and testimony and finances to do so so that the discrimination and retaliation will cease and my approved bills will be paid and other benefits paid as approved and receive fairness and justice in the deciding of any other items before you and anything that may need to be presented in the future?
                                                       Linda Joy Adams
                                                         22+ year struggle for life  on a non- controverted accepted, established case with permanent medical benefits under a laws  that was past to prevent deaths when these kinds of abuses of power and discrimination's occur. REMEMBER: my file was  feloniously ' riffled ' in the Dallas regional office that started this last 11 + year old life and death struggle.
                                   ACCIDENT REPORT:
The phone calls today to verify the on-going discrimination has had a terrible toil on my accepted medical conditions and rest is badly needed, but this request had to be filed as there is no assurance that anyone will take their responsibility to my life and files to assist. I can't go to London Ky and post the files myself having nether the skills or authority to do so without further physical injury and exacerbation's of my accepted conditions. The physical theraphy has made a new discovery of a related injury; the atrophy? of muscles surrounding the diapraham. Since 1/10/89, I can only breathe from the ' stomach' as 'chest breathing' is no longer possible due to the extensive damage from the orignal injury. Recently read that the method of breathing I use, along with 24/7 Oxygen, is  being widely accepted for this kind of injury. We no longer die in 5 years as my case proves. But every exacerbation reduces my longevity and its not fair and just for what is occurring to be happeinng, its illegal and discriminatory and unconstitutional.